In the world of venture-funded companies , not much amazes industry commentators. Yet anew strategy employed by one privately held companymight have founders and venture investors wondering if its a maneuverworth replicating.
What happened: The U.S. subsidiary of aventure-backed Berlin-based search optimization company called Searchmetricsjust filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in Delaware.
What its interesting: Sources close to Searchmetrics say the company was forced to file to escape a longstanding battle with venture-backedcompetitor BrightEdge, are stationed in Menlo Park. Specifically, Searchmetrics allegesthat BrightEdge stole itsintellectual property, then filed for patents around it.( Searchmetrics says it had patents on its technology in Europe but failed to secure similar patents in the U.S ., which created an opening for BrightEdge to exploit .)
Heres how Searchmetricsschief restructuring officer, Wayne Weitz, describes the companies rivalry in a letter he submitted to the court today: One of the[ Searchmetricss] primary competitors in the U.S. marketplace is BrightEdge Technology[ which] sought to acquire or merge with Searchmetrics in or about October of 2013. During acquisition discussions, BrightEdge became privy to Searchmetrics confidential, proprietary, competitive information and business practices, including its business model and growth plans. Ultimately, Searchmetrics and BrightEdge could not agree on terms and the acquisition discussions fell apart.
Unbeknownst to Searchmetrics, whilst in the midst of the acquisition discussions, BrightEdge developed a campaign to eliminate[ Searchmetricss] presence in the U.S. market. BrightEdge started by engaging in a smear campaign designed to enticement the Debtors customers and prospective a user to BrightEdge by making false and disparaging statements about Searchmetricss products, and then initiated vexatious, baseless, and prolonged litigation against[ Searchmetrics] on two fronts. This Chapter 11 Case was initiated to bring[ this litigation] to an expeditious and cost-effective end to permit the Debtor to reorganize, failing which,[ Searchmetrics] will be liquidated.
Searchmetrics employees 250 people altogether; its U.S. subsidiary employs 40, mostly marketing and sales staff whoare located primarily in San Mateo, Ca.
One source tells us that with the exception of one or two people, the companys U.S.-based employees are paid on wage and committees, so arent at risk of watching their equity impacted by the filing.( Typically, in such a proceeding, theres little to nothing left for shareholders oncemore senior creditors are paid. In this case, BrightEdge would be considered a creditor, though Searchmetrics is hoping to pay it a whole lot less than BrightEdge might win in a patent suit .)
Themove is far from certain to work. Richard Kanowitz, a New York attorney who specializes in insolvencies on behalf of Cooley , notes that, With insolvency, theres an automatic bide, but whether that bide holds is another story.( We should add we merely asked Kanowitz whether he thought it was unusual for a venture-backed company to file for bankruptcy protection to spare itself from a patent suit. He wasnt aware of the companies involved at the time .)
Stephen Lubben, an expert on insolvency who teaches corporate governance and business ethics at Seton Hall Law School, meanwhile observes that yes, insolvency filings by venture capital-backed companies are rare, particularly in California, where thestrong preference is to do an assigning for the benefit of creditors that allowsbackers more say in howtosave their investments.
But also speaking generally and not specifically about these two companies, Lubben says thatbankruptcy filings solely to address a single piece of litigation are dicey. The tribunal might reject the filing as being in bad faith. The company will have to show some other reason for needing to regroup, and that its not just trying to stiff a single creditor.
Asked for a comment about its Chapter 11 strategy, a Searchmetrics spokesman wrote in an email to usthat the U.S. subsidiary cannot invest properly in growing its business despite longstanding client approval of our Searchmetrics products, a deep pipeline that brings new innovations in online content marketing, and a great relationship with our mother company, while trying to fend off BrightEdge.
Meanwhile, asked for his reaction, BrightEdge founder and CEO Jim Yu saidvia email: BrightEdge does not comment on the substance of pending litigation.
Ten-year-old Searchmetrics has raised roughly $32 million from investors, shows Crunchbase. Its backers include Holtzbrinck Digital, Iris Capital and Kreos Capital , among others.
BrightEdge, also founded 10 years ago, has raised around $62 million, according to Crunchbase. Its investors include Illuminate Ventures, Insight Venture Partners, Intel Capital, Altos Partners and Battery Ventures.
You can read through Searchmetricss court filings here.